Home > News content

The model 3 test failed many times, causing the dummy to crash into the air. Tesla responded that the video was taken out of context

via:快科技     time:2020/9/22 8:31:40     readed:86

AEB automatic auxiliary brake system can greatly avoid accidents caused by distracted driving and effectively protect pedestrians.At present, this configuration has become the standard of many models. And in terms of the current autonomous driving experience, Tesla's model 3 has a high reputation and good evaluation. But what I didn't expect was,A "smart" car like this, but in the simplest AEB test ," overturned "the car.


Ali Cloud launched a special college special event 0 yuan experience entry cloud computing rapid deployment of entrepreneurial projects

According to the video uploaded by netizens, there are also Tesla Model 3 in the open car intelligence challenge.

Among those moving dummies across AEB auto brake test project,Model 3 performance is surprising.

When the test begins, the Model 3 travels at normal test speed, and then the dummy in front begins to cross the Model 3 carriageway.

Although the Model 3 issued a warning, but still did not carry out effective brake, directly hit up, the dummy also hit a fine broken.

Seeing that the "autopilot" has been the selling point of publicity Model 3, even such a simple simulation of pedestrian crossing test conditions have not passed, netizens have also ridiculed.

"Tesla can identify the dummy, so it's okay ." "People are proving that the front bars are strong, and hitting people will not affect the safety of people in the car ".

At the same time, Tesla Customer Support responded in the comments section of a well-known car blogger, which said:The automobile industry detection is highly professional. Any informal official testing video which is taken out of context will only mislead the masses and consumers and cause harm to the whole automobile industry.

As peers, we call on everyone to respect each other, respect and abide by the minimum business ethics and ethics, adopt proper marketing methods and methods to promote the healthy development of the whole industry. Thanks to all those who have worked to move the world towards sustainable energy.

However, such a slightly "pale" explanation can not convince the majority of netizens. To this end, automobile bloggers also gave a response: 1.Model 3 smashed the dummy, the video was not out of context.

2. admittedly this is not your official test, but it also represents the reliability of Tesla's security system to some extent.

3. Please note that this incident only represents Tesla's single product, and Tesla is not safe. Do not force it to the height of promoting the transformation of the whole world to sustainable energy.

In addition, it is worth mentioning that this is not the only Tesla Model to "roll over" in the AEB test.

A few days ago, in order to test the ability of AEB automatic assistant driving system of each vehicle series, a car blogger has measured the four models of Weilai es8, Audi Q7, Tesla Model X and Volvo XC90. (click here to watch the video)

But even more unexpected to netizens, Tesla Model x, which costs more than 700000 yuan,In the 20 km / h low-speed test of fixed dummy and "pedestrian ghost probe", they failed to pass the test, and the dummy was directly knocked into flight, becoming the worst performance vehicle among the four models tested.

As the saying goes, there is no harm without contrast, four models, the same test conditions, only Tesla Model X did not pass the fixed dummy test. Such a test is clearly not out of context, but can also explain a lot of problems.

In a word, Tesla has a high reputation and good reputation in the field of automatic driving.

But in the relatively simple AEB test, can not pass the test. How dare this let consumer, completely rest assured use Tesla's "Autopolit" function.

China IT News APP

Download China IT News APP

Please rate this news

The average score will be displayed after you score.

Post comment

Do not see clearly? Click for a new code.

User comments