How many people have discovered that today's domestic smartphone manufacturers are targeting Apple, and they have made "curve overtaking" on the video, battery life, fast charge, and screen tracks, but in the process of "overtaking" Pulling the apple down, he was exhausted. Just as Apple uses the LCD screen, the Android machine manufacturer is scrambling to start the starting of the mobile phone screen with the OLED screen; now when the Android machine has been rolled to the 2K screen, Apple is still unwilling to stop.
Someone can't help but ask, why don't Apple use a 2K screen on the iPhone?
When you usually say that the stalk is usually said, there will be a netizen to answer Cook: Why do I use a 2K screen for the iPhone?
As we all know, Apple basically does not use the screen to make articles. The reason why the iPhone has such a large user group mainly relies on strong chips and iOS systems.
But the chips and systems of Android machines are almost almost the same. The only difference is the technical adjustment and algorithm of the manufacturer. Therefore, the Android machine is rolled up to now, the 2K screen is one of the main highlights of the publicity.
In fact, as ordinary consumers, to be honest, even if a 2K -screen Android machine is used in hand, there is no substantial effect on the naked eye view. Even if you hold 1080P mobile phones in your hand, it will not affect you Watch videos, brush webpages, and play games, because we are just ordinary consumers, and we will not understand more information about research screens at all.
Of course, we also know that 2K will be better than 1080P, but where is good, it is really impossible to say. In the end, it may only say "it is much clearer".
According to domestic mobile phone manufacturers, 2K screen resolution reached 3216x1440. Compared with the iPhone 13 Pro Max's 2778x1284 resolution, it is obviously not the standard of 2K screens, but it is undeniable that the iPhone does not use the 2K screen to sell it. it is good.
Because the viewing of the screen display is good or not, it is not only determined by the resolution, there are two important factors, that is, the screen size and pixel density (PPI). Pixel density represents the number of pixels per inch of the screen. The higher the value, the more delicate the picture. Therefore, under the same resolution, the results of different sizes and pixel density are different.
Take the iPhone 13 Pro Max as an example, the 6.7 -inch (diagonal) OLED full screen, 2778 x 1284 pixel resolution, and the pixel density reaches 458 PPI. Compared with a domestic flagship machine with a 2K screen, it is also a 6.7 -inch (diagonal) screen with a resolution of 3216x1440 and a pixel density of 525 PPI.
Seeing this, it seems that the 2K screen is necessary. However, it should be reminded that Apple uses pixel density to formulate screens instead of resolution. Let's put it this way, since Jobs's "retina display" proposed by Jobs at the iPhone 4 was released at the iPhone 4, the standards for displaying mobile phone screens are based on Apple standards.
Looking at the conference of the year, Apple put the pixel of 960X640 in a 3.5 -inch screen, so that the pixel density of this screen reached 330 PPI. Jobs said, "When the things you take are 10-12 inches (about 25-30 cm) from you, its resolution only needs to reach 300ppi (300 pixels per inches) or more "
This is the original definition of Apple's "retina screen". The pixel density of the iPhone 4 screen also reached 326ppi. At that time, the Android mobile phone manufacturers were forced to continue the 720p that did not meet the retinal screen standards because of this concept of Jobs to 1080P. Later, because Apple changed to the OLED screen, it changed the pixel density to 450 PPI, which has been used to this day.
Having said that, the inside of the Android machine is not only there. In addition to the size than the screen, the size of the listed machine is larger than one. The problem is obvious. Under the same resolution, the pixel density of Android is naturally not as good as the iPhone. Therefore, if the Android machine wants to not lose the apple and the size cannot be reduced by the PPI machine, only the resolution is improved.
In fact, as an ordinary user, it is not required that mobile phone manufacturers must launch a 2K screen mobile phone. Instead, the manufacturer can only catch the screen pixel density of their products to the Apple. One of the highlights. After all, when the performance cannot exceed Apple, it can only be overtaked in the curve as mentioned above, the openness and compatibility of the screen, image, system, and even the price to "compete" with Apple.
Let's take a look at Apple, is Apple's 2K screen really because it is "rotten"? The reason why Apple is not rushing to use 2K screens like an Android machine is because it is not necessary.
In theory, 2K is indeed excellent, but for the human eye, as long as the mobile phone does not have obvious granularity, it will not feel too much when watching the mobile phone. Only when you see it in front of you, you will see the difference, but most people will not look at their mobile phones like this.
And the more important point is that because the energy consumption is, the 2K screen will obviously be higher. Apple naturally thinks of this. After all, the crushed charging experience is not scolded, and there is no need to add one more.
Therefore, it is a general trend for Android manufacturers to launch a 2K screen. For me who uses ordinary mobile phones, whether the 2K screen does not affect my mobile phone.